--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de reqSuite® rm? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de reqSuite® rm gracias a Capterra Perú. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: reqSuite® rm - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Perú 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [reqSuite® rm](/software/162954/reqsuite) # reqSuite® rm Canonical: https://www.capterra.pe/software/162954/reqsuite Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.pe/software/162954/reqsuite?page=2) > Una de las principales herramientas de gestión de riesgos para empresas medianas e innovadoras: fácil de usar, potente, 100 % personalizable y de rápida implementación. > > Veredicto: 35 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.6/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa reqSuite® rm? Empresas de una gran variedad de sectores confían en reqSuite® rm. Gracias a su fácil capacidad de configuración con una variedad exhaustiva de opciones, se puede adaptar rápida y completamente a la situación específica de cada cliente. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.6/5** | 35 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: OSSENO Software GmbH - **Ubicación**: Kaiserslautern, Alemania - **Constitución**: 2014 ## Contexto comercial - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (local) - **Idiomas admitidos**: alemán, francés, inglés - **Países disponibles**: Alemania, Austria, Bulgaria, Bélgica, Canadá, Dinamarca, España, Estados Unidos, Estonia, Finlandia, Francia, Irlanda, Islandia, Israel, Italia, Letonia, Liechtenstein, Lituania, Luxemburgo, Noruega y 7 más ## Funciones - Control de versiones - Controles o permisos de acceso - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Gestión de requisitos - Gestión de tareas - Gestión del cambio - Gestión del ciclo de vida - Herramientas de colaboración - Presupuestos/previsiones - Priorización - Seguimiento de progreso de tareas ## Integraciones (en total: 10) - Azure DevOps Server - ClickUp - Enterprise Architect - GitLab - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Redmine - TestRail ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](https://www.capterra.pe/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](https://www.capterra.pe/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [Software de gestión del ciclo de vida de las aplicaciones](https://www.capterra.pe/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [Software de PLM (gestión del ciclo de vida del producto)](https://www.capterra.pe/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.pe/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.pe/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 3. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.pe/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 4. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.pe/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) 5. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.pe/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Easy, flexible Customer Support and good value for Requirements Engineering\!" — 5.0/5 > **Leon** | *10 de noviembre de 2025* | Dispositivos médicos | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Great Customer Support, we got a very good package from the start as an early stage company and was greatly supported by \[sensitive content hidden\] himself. Especially for lean teams the software is very good suited, we worked with very holistic PLM tools before which would be an overkill for our team size. Team Collaboration works very good as well. > > **Puntos en contra**: The software could improve regarding usability and certain functionalities are not directly clear but apart from that we are happy with it. > > We are very happy to work with the ReqSuite team and their flexibility to react and find practical solutions. ----- ### "Easy to Use Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Kevin** | *20 de febrero de 2026* | Diseño | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Reqsuite is a great value with alot of capability for a very value oriented price. Some tools may have slightly more capabilities but have significantly more expense. The tool is quite intuitive to use overall and provides a great level of traceability. > > **Puntos en contra**: The ability to order created items in a drag/drop order is limited and can only be done via folders. This is a new feature that has been requested but is the largest challenge. > > The overall experience has been great. The support and answering questions has been very supportive overall. The tool is quite intuitive and most users are able to navigate it effectively with a basic level of training. ----- ### "Poor user experience" — 1.0/5 > **Ilona** | *12 de diciembre de 2024* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 0.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Methodology behind seems to be quite good, but the implementation is poor. Excel import/export is quite good as it allows me not to use ReqSuite. > > **Puntos en contra**: Terrible user experience - opening tickets only in one window - time consuming to do anything, several seconds to open another/parent ticket, no sensible tracking of dependencies (only direct links, so the most important info like full decomposition of requirements to system function or cross-dependenciess are not available) - everything needs to opened one by one which again takes time. Discussion/comment section is so tiny... Navigation in ticket detail is confusing and very annoying - when I open the detail in 1-window system, the search list is no longer visible until closing/minimizing the detail. Strange behaviour when updating decomposed issues - when I update one, it freezes the whole structure and it is not possible to work with them until it it propagates everything (which can take anything from 10s - 3mins) > > In short - very bad user experience and very unefficient tool for managing requirement. One-window is very 1995-like feature. Requires to spend hours and hours to manage simple structure this way. Use JIRA or Confluence instead... ----- ### "Powerful tool, sometimes frusturating." — 4.0/5 > **Alondra** | *13 de marzo de 2026* | Investigación | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The versatility in all the different item types and links which can be created. It makes it easy to build up the database you need for your project. > > **Puntos en contra**: Slow and clumsy interface. For example, loading a given requirement takes several seconds. If items are sorted into sub folders, there's no easy way to see all the items within a parent folder. Importing items from other projects is not currently working. ----- ### "ReqSuite - easy to use, good features" — 5.0/5 > **James** | *5 de mayo de 2025* | Energías renovables y medio ambiente | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Easy to use, simple structure you can tailor to your needs. Great support from Osseno. Fast response to questions and issues. Onboarding process was smooth, efficient and helped us structure our product/requirements relationships. > > **Puntos en contra**: Some issues with the screen resolution. Minor issue that the responsible person for each requirement is not fixed and sometimes changes depending on the requirement state and user account rights (but this is already being worked on by Osseno for a future update) > > Great experience, so far. Moved to ReqSuite RM from excel and it has completely changed how we are able to record and track changes for our complex requirements set. The tool gives us all the features we need for this and is even adjustable enough for us to use for other related tasks such as FMECA, HAZID, etc. Simple to use which helps as we grow into our use of the tool. ----- Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.pe/software/162954/reqsuite?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.pe/software/162954/reqsuite) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados