Opiniones de JIRA Service Management

Sobre JIRA Service Management

Redefine lo que TI significa para tu negocio con JIRA Service Desk en https://www.atlassian.com/service-desk.

Descubre más sobre JIRA Service Management

Puntos a favor:

Offers a wide variety of customization options making it easy to tailor to multiple business needs. Dashboard shows you what cases you have open and the stages the cases are in.

Contras:

Custom domains, multiple email handing, enhanced portal customization, the basics... all missing.

Valoraciones de JIRA Service Management

Evaluación media

Facilidad de uso
4.2
Atención al cliente
4.3
Funcionalidades
4.3
Relación calidad-precio
4.2

Probabilidad de recomendación

8.3/10

JIRA Service Management tiene una valoración global de 4.4 estrellas sobre 5 según las 309 opiniones de usuarios de Capterra.

¿Ha utilizado JIRA Service Management antes?

Comparte tu experiencia con otros compradores de software.

Filtrar opiniones (309)

Danilo G.
Responsable de Seguridad IT en Argentina
Comercio minorista, 1,001-5,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

JIRA una solución completa con infinidades de funcionalidades

4.0 hace 2 meses Nuevo

Puntos a favor:

Posee muchos módulos que se complementan entre sí, como Confluence para la gestión de Conocimientos.

Contras:

La segmentación de permisos es demasiado granular, haciendo realmente complejo el proceso de ABM.

Josemaria G.
Josemaria G.
Vice Director for External Affairs en Filipinas
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Aprendizaje en línea, 51-200 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: 1-5 meses
Fuente de la reseña

From the Trusted Atlassian

5.0 hace 3 años

Comentarios: In a crowded space for helpdesk apps, Jira Service Desk stood out because of the company that backs it up, its family of related apps and, the current integrations with existing third-party apps out there. Jira SD is well worth trying out.

Puntos a favor:

From the same company of my favorite and trusted apps like Trello and Jira... We then gave Jira Service Desk a try. The user interface has a modern look and feel and is intuitive enough even for a novice user or admin. It has a pretty standard set of tools to run your usual IT Helpdesk and Support roles straight out of the box (Incident management, Problem, Change, SLA management, etc.). In fact, you can set up your helpdesk well within an hour (of course not counting the per company nitty-gritty). Default setup works, but it's also super customizable based on your company needs. The Dashboard has all the at-a-glance metrics, statistics and graphs to keep you up to speed with the overall status. Again, coming from Atlassian, it has a ton of possibilities in terms of integration with other apps. I feel the constant stream of dev improvements and updates.

Contras:

Even though I mentioned that the third party apps can be easily integrable, we find the documentation for creating one's own integration apps a bit lacking. Also, the creation of tickets can be more streamlined or simplified (perhaps with the minimum number of fields and button clicks) to make it easier or faster to create and then further details can follow.

Ashish V.
Senior Architect en Canadá
Seguros, 10,000+ empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Alternativas consideradas:

Life Savior tool for Agile Projects

4.0 hace 4 semanas Nuevo

Comentarios: JIRA is becoming one shop all for all project management needs.
It also act as a tracking warehouse for all project management and IT management activities in current agile world.
Scrum meeting actions and stories are easy to browse compared to other existing tools on premise.
JIRA is also efficient to manage code control versioning easily by rapidly varying requirements.
It saves a huge cost for placeholder for our IT Asset management when migrated from traditional software

Puntos a favor:

JIRA service management is very use friendly software in day to day project activities. JIRA has been excellent tracking tool for testing bugs, defects easily during entire project cycle. It is very effective place holder for IT asset management and project management phases. JIRA has capabilities to integrate with multiple ITSM management tools and reporting tools for effective reports and dashboarding.

Contras:

New changes for html pages take little more time for loading when moved to production. Version controlling sometimes create hiccups during rollback period.

Daniel C.
Application Support Analyst en Australia
Servicios, 201-500 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Administrator

3.0 hace 2 semanas Nuevo

Puntos a favor:

The product is easy to use and user friendly

Contras:

The product cannot integrate with the existing company project and incident management application

Usuario verificado
Senior Operations Engineer en India
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Servicios financieros, 10,000+ empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Alternativas consideradas:

Service Management Tool Anybody Can Use

5.0 hace 3 meses

Puntos a favor:

The ease of use and anybody can use the tool for Ticketing, project management, issue tracking, dashboards etc...

Contras:

The options are at times clumsy and confuse the end users when the data is too much.

Usuario verificado
Software developer en Polonia
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Software informático, 501-1,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Excellent project management tool

4.0 hace 2 meses

Comentarios: I have been working with JIRA Service Management for 4 years now and I found out that every process connected to software development can be easily described and tracked using this tool. I have also used the ticketing system a lot and found it very intuitive and always found what I needed.

Puntos a favor:

It's the best tool for project management I have worked with. It's best at tracking progress of user stories and tasks, but works well also as a ticketing system and time tracking application. It is easy to track multiple projects at once thank to a possibility to create dashboards and groups for each of them. It can also be integrated with confluence in order implement an integrated knowledge base.

Contras:

The text editor could be improved, as well as some features could be implemented to make the user stories and filtering management a bit more user-friendly and provide better user experience.

Usuario verificado
Data Engineer en EE. UU.
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Tecnología y servicios de la información, 1,001-5,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

The best project management

5.0 hace 2 semanas Nuevo

Puntos a favor:

The ability to add ticket types, based on project needs over the year. JIRA maintains its high quality of tracking different types of issues concurrently.

Contras:

The open issues feature in the mobile app needs a filtering mechanism. No way to search the issue board based on the assignee.

Elyes C.
Elyes C.
Application Securtiy Engineer en Túnez
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Tecnología y servicios de la información, 1,001-5,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Jira Service Management Review

4.0 hace 2 meses

Puntos a favor:

Jira give you the ability to create, assign and follow the task easily. The Jira API is a big plus for the integration with other tools

Contras:

Jira service management needs to improve their UI

Usuario verificado
Security Engineer en Canadá
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Servicios financieros, 201-500 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Jira Service Management - A great Issue Tracker / Inventory management tool

4.0 hace 2 meses Nuevo

Puntos a favor:

This tool helps with Issues tracking, inventory management and resource management

Contras:

Could be a pain to customize to suit our needs

Daniel K.
Daniel K.
Founder en Argentina
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Internet, 11-50 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: 1-5 meses
Fuente de la reseña

Alternativas consideradas:

Jira Service Managment Surprise me for good

5.0 la semana pasada Nuevo

Puntos a favor:

It's a very neat piece of software. It's interface is clean and the assistant works pretty well.

Contras:

It's hard to integrate with other, legacy systems

Usuario verificado
PSI en Turquía
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Electrónica de consumo, 10,000+ empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: 1-5 meses
Fuente de la reseña

Agile Service Management Tool

5.0 hace 3 semanas Nuevo

Comentarios: I use this for my business and it's great because we can create tasks and assign them to each other, see who's working on what and track how much time we've spent on each task. The timesheet feature is great to keep track of how much time we've spent on jobs and it also tracks how much time we've spent on each task. It's helpful and it makes it easy to look up what we've been up to for the day. I like that we can also create reports using Jira and it's also a great way to see what's going on in the business.

Puntos a favor:

It makes Service Management more agile and initiutive. It's great to integrate to the other Atlassian products such as Jira and Confleunce.

Contras:

It needs some UI & UX developments, UI can be more clearç.

Usuario verificado
Post Production Engineer en EE. UU.
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Entretenimiento, 501-1,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Powerful and Capable, but easy to over complicate things

5.0 hace 2 años

Comentarios: Initial setup can be complex but it can also be super powerful if you are able to configure it properly. It's visual scripting and workflow tool is really capable and easy to learn

Puntos a favor:

Its flexibility. It's a simple statement, I agree, and you're probably reading this wondering why I'm being so vague. But JIRA software is a bit hard to summarize simply because it's just so flexible. There's no "correct" way to use it. It's rest API is pretty powerful too and very easy to extend Jira to "integrate" with 3rd party applications that doesn't have an official Jira integration.

Contras:

Creating workflows can easily become very confusing and you can easily break how your projects in Jira work if you aren't careful. With every Jira production license you also get a free dev license so that you can set up an isolated dev/staging environment. This is invaluable and highly recommended. The downside is that there is no easy way to migrate any of your changes from dev to production. But there are 3rd party plugins for that.

Chirag S.
CITO en EE. UU.
Seguros, 51-200 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de un año
Fuente de la reseña

Alternativas consideradas:

Efficient service desk for companies small, medium or large

5.0 hace 2 años

Comentarios: Prior to using Jira Service Desk, were using a combination of Excel and SharePoint with workflows. We couldn't get great reports. It was hard to customize. Workflows broke without a reason because, you know, it's SharePoint. And the entire process of serving customers was dead slow. We brought in Jira Service Desk as a test bed. Within 2 hours, we were testing and customers were putting in tickets. While we used most of the default settings, the value we were generating was way beyond we ever had. Then, we set up SLAs and watch reports for a few days. We were able to see everything we wanted - who reported the issue, when, what was the priority, how many comment exchanges happened, how much time did we spend, did we meet SLAs, what was the solution, etc. Fast forward 2 years. We are now able to create strategies to service internal and external customers better based on the data from Jira. It has helped us go from making gut-feel decisioning to data-centric decisioning. Good data wins debates. Jira helped us with good data. We are also utilizing Jira's excellent searching, dashboarding and API functionality to feed data to other systems and drive changes beyond just customers.

Puntos a favor:

Jira Service Desk was very easy to get started with. You could literally sign up for it and begin using it within an hour. Ticketing system is very customizable and powerful. Customers can be added in bulk and customers can sign up for entering issues. We were able to create different projects (or service queues) so that customers could send requests for IT help, or administrative help, or help with projects. Each such project/queue had different fields. Metrics are all built into the software, so we can know how often Service Level Agreements were breached, who breached them etc. The sheer amount of customizability is a joy. However, without discipline and thoughtfulness, it is very easy to customize it the wrong way.

Contras:

We feel that the price point could be lower and the speed could be a little faster. Atlassian has made improvements with speed. If a company had 5 people manning different queues and the issue volume is low, the cost would be ~1500/year for those 5 users. So, it would may not be cost effective for a small company that is watching their costs closely. We also felt that a Wiki is not built in. So, if a common solution needs to documented that spans multiple tickets, there's no way to do so. We could buy Confluence from Atlassian for an additional cost.

Usuario verificado
ICT Systems Coordinator en RU
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Música, 501-1,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: 6-12 meses
Fuente de la reseña

Alternativas consideradas:

A great option for on-site ICT service desk management

5.0 hace 3 años

Comentarios: Overall we are very happy with Jira Service Desk; it has allowed us to provide a higher level of support to users than our previous service desk, and non-profit pricing was very beneficial for us. The software is usable in its default setup but we have found that there is still plenty of customisation that can be done if needed to suit more complex requirements.

Puntos a favor:

I find the UI of Jira Service Desk very clean and modern compared to other service desks software on the market. Included with the service desk is a customisable user-facing portal for users to raise tickets in, which proved very popular with staff when raising tickets alongside traditional email tickets. Due to the way Jira splits service desks into different projects, we were able to create service desks for other departments in the organisation which helped improve productivity and workflow. There are some very useful and well-designed default reports included for ticket statistics (which can be used to keep management happy!). We found the default setup of Jira Service Desk fit our needs very well, but it is very easy to customise ticket workflows and other features to suit more complex needs.

Contras:

For a service desk technician using Jira Service Desk the back-end UI for managing tickets can be a little overwhelming, however this can be fixed by editing the default workflows for tickets to hide not required information and details. The administration settings are somewhat unintuitively set out for system administrators, but once you get to grips with the layout it becomes easy enough to find what you need from the settings page. We found the instructions on the Atlassian website for setting up an external redirect with a custom URL in IIS a little sparse on detail, but a quick trip to the Atlassian forums cleared up any queries we had with the process.

Jack P.
Software Support Specialist en EE. UU.
Software informático, 51-200 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: 6-12 meses
Fuente de la reseña

JSD has a lot to offer, but requires a lot to learn

4.0 hace 4 años

Comentarios: JSD offers a lot for any company needing to maintain a service desk to manage the support requests it handles from its clients/customers. Because it is a Jira (Atalassian) product, it is most likely utilized along with other Jira tools, and plays quite well with those. Due to this integration aspect, thought, the layers of security necessitated within user settings requires a considerable amount of learning/training, which is not easily attained without paying for it from Atalassian. And, while I understand, respect (and even applaud) the market-oriented principle of this, it does seem a bit intentional that there are no reliable helps available outside of Atlassian (for example, any tutorials you will find on YouTube for assisting with certain user configs, settings, steps, etc. are applicable to much older versions of the software, and to a great extent, are not applicable to the current version). This would not be a negative aspect if Jira did a much better job at keeping their own internal (free) help docs, etc. up to date, so as to apply to the current version, as well. Instead, if one wants highly dependable "helps" it appears the best way to achieve that is to pay Atlassian for their training courses (at prices that are obviously calibrated toward larger companies/corporations. And blindly undertaking such would seem risky if judged by the extent to which their free user tools are kept up to date. This is not, to my knowledge, the common experience with most apps.

Puntos a favor:

- Lots of tools in one place - Integrates well with other apps (especially other Atlassian products) - UI is clean and user friendly (customizable to a sensible extent) - Contains useful metrics that are easy to configure and gain reports from - Has multiple layers of user settings available for custom configuration to correlate to preferred levels of access among agents, customers, etc.

Contras:

- Email bounce in frequently fails (bugs?) - Depth of Jira admin user knowledge required for strong mastery of this app; time consuming to acquire a reliable user knowledge (which is necessary to utilize the app with the least bit of efficiency) - Help docs, support mechanism unreliable/outdated (needs to be fresh and current to be applicable to present version of app) - Confusing settings requirements for some user modifications needs (esp. where mapping/editing workflow schemes are concerned) - Completely inadequate amount of general helps/tutorials available outside of Atlassian (YouTube, Google search, etc. for example) which seems a bit suppressed by design. Atlassian offers extensive training, but at a premium cost. - Costly for the overall effectiveness it provides, after factoring these negatives along with the user time required to really learn the application.

Justin alex P.
Technology Consultant en EE. UU.
Software informático, 201-500 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Highly customizable and integrates well with the Atlassian ecosystem

4.0 hace 5 años

Comentarios: Customization, integrations, workflows, SLAs

Puntos a favor:

Newbies to JIRA Service Desk can get a service desk project up and running in less than 30 minutes. If your organization is already using JIRA for issue tracking, then having a help desk with Service Desk is a no brainer. It allows you to integrate software teams and IT teams better within the same ecosystem. The benefit of JIRA Service Desk, when compared with other help desk tools, is the customizability of your workflow. You can set up a workflow to be simple (with Open > In Progress > Closed statuses) or complex (with other statuses like On Hold or Waiting for Customer). SLAs are highly configurable, with the power of JIRA's JQL functionality. So one can conjure up a query to fit their SLA needs. With the addition of custom fields, a Service Desk administrator can create fields to capture important information to streamline the help desk process. Having Confluence also provides more benefits in which you can integrate an existing knowledge base space to a help desk project and self-serve your customers. Finally, being in the Atlassian ecosystem enables you to add additional functionality and enhancements with the use of Apps. There are close to 1500 apps available for JIRA, and many are constantly updated by the app developers.

Contras:

Administering JIRA Service Desk (and JIRA in general) can be daunting for a new user. With a number of customizations that one can do in a JIRA application, there will come a time where there can be a performance impact on the environment if the application is not governed well. The Customer Portal (customer facing interface) is spartan in terms of customization. You can only customize so much, but it is limited in terms of branding it to suit your company's design specs.

Andrea C.
ICT Solutions en Italia
Ocio, viajes y turismo, 201-500 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de un año
Fuente de la reseña

Alternativas consideradas:

Best on premise

4.0 hace 3 años

Comentarios: We use on premise version. Software administration can be burdensome for a small staff, updates and monitoring can require quite a lot of time. Price raised two times since first purchase. Apart from this, the tool has enabled us to precisely structure the service desk, reducing by 70% the number of phone calls and emails to better filled forms on the customer portal and the use of a chat addon.

Puntos a favor:

- High Control - Wide choices of features - Confluence Integration - Very rich suite of addons on premise version...

Contras:

- ...which requires extra costs - Some features are too basic and pretty much requires addons - Learning Curve for admin requires effort

Usuario verificado
Vice President, HR Operations and Insights Manager en EE. UU.
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Banca, 501-1,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de un año
Fuente de la reseña

Alternativas consideradas:

Great Service Desk for Human Resources

5.0 hace 2 años

Comentarios: Jira has transformed our 12-person HR department. We can now easily track incoming requests, are not reliant on email for communication, can create canned responses for consistency and efficiency, and we have the ability to operate 100% paperlessly.

Puntos a favor:

Jira is extremely customizable, scalable, and easy to implement when compared with other SD platforms. Out of the box, it can be used as a tool to track incoming requests, however, paired with the thousands of compatible plugins, it is unparalleled. Jira SD has allowed our HR team to take our daily operations to the next level, transitioning antiquated, clunky paper processes into a 100% paperless experience.

Contras:

My only complaint is when custom fields are added, you have to update every field configuration you have, individually. This is extremely time-consuming when adding multiple custom fields in an effort to create "forms" within Jira.

Niall H.
Head of Information Systems en Irlanda
Tecnología y servicios de la información, 1,001-5,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Alternativas consideradas:

A good option for Service Desks but check your requirements carefully

4.0 hace 5 meses

Comentarios: A stable, performant platform for customer support is critical and JIRA Service Management has delivered that.

Puntos a favor:

Easy to set up and deploy, configuration is relatively easy, the platform is stable and performant. There is a good 3rd party marketplace for additional apps that can be installed. Security options like SSO are available. Customer Support is responsive and knowledgeable.

Contras:

Reporting on SLAs is poor, overall reporting is ok but could be better. Costs ramp up significantly as Atlassian Access is required if you want SSO, this is an addtional charge per user. The pricing is done on a per user tier level e.g. 101-200 users is a price so you have to pay for 200 user accounts even if you only have 101 actual users.

Hiren P.
Cloud Platform Engineer en EE. UU.
Tecnología y servicios de la información, 501-1,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

JIRA Service Management is excellent Saas Platform for your ready to use need & with other flexibili

5.0 hace 3 días Nuevo

Comentarios: Overall good experience.

Puntos a favor:

JIRA Service Managment is have lots of customization capability & also ready made template is also good. Ready made report is good but for accurate details need more tuning to the reports or create own customize report.

Contras:

When reporting things come in picture that require customization. Also standard ticket type is not good enought for day to day use. So to configure all these need require experience user or consultant to understand your need & configure it.

Eva K.
Customer Experience en Kenia
Telecomunicaciones, 51-200 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

About Jira - Project Planning

5.0 el año pasado

Comentarios: The initial setup was quite a challenge but, here we are. It's an awesome system for tracking project issues, especially for new clients during onboarding.

Puntos a favor:

It's a good platform to track issues that are being handled by each individual in a project. It also has the option for notification being sent out when an item has been resolved, closed, or has gone overdue. If it's configured correctly to have a backup, the team members involved can always learn from the past incidences reported. This will ensure that the team leader will be able to identify recurring items, timelines it took for resolution, and the team member assigned to resolve such items. This ensures that such items are priority issues that need in-depth understanding for them to be resolved permanently.

Contras:

As an organization, we have not been able to integrate Jira with osTicket, which our customer Experience team uses. This means we have two Systems, and at times this can be overwhelming to track issues on both Jira and osTicket.

Robert K.
Producer, Media Production Group en EE. UU.
Producción audiovisual, 5,001-10,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de un año
Fuente de la reseña

Best ticket system

4.0 hace 3 años

Comentarios: The business problem Jira service desk solves is allowing anyone to put in a request from a service department from one portal & be able to access that portal anywhere in the world and not just on our internal network.

Puntos a favor:

Jira Service desk works great. We use it in a media company in all of the service departments to track requests from Media ingest, to graphic requests, to crew requests. Our producers can easily log in from anywhere and fill out customized forms for the type of service they are looking for. The department gets the request in seconds and can start fulfilling it right away. In a fast pace news world, this allows us to get what is needed for broadcast air done fast while keeping track of all the work we have to do.

Contras:

There are some features that you would think would come right out of the box with jira service desk that doesn't. The only way to get them is to buy a plug-in from their market place. Some features that we would like to see is having the requester see who is assigned the order & allow them to request updates to their requests.

Erik B.
VP, Product Development and Engineering en EE. UU.
Software informático, 51-200 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: 6-12 meses
Fuente de la reseña

Dig Deep Before Buying

4.0 hace 4 años

Comentarios: It has solved some of our immediate business needs out-of-the-box or with moderate configuration effort. But as a full solution it is missing a handful of simple, but crucial, features. It definitely "feels" like a second version. It needs a third.

Puntos a favor:

JSD is relatively intuitive and easy to learn without needing tons of documentation. Initial pricing is attractive. A decent plugin community fills some gaps, but be expected to pay on top of the initial JSD pricing.

Contras:

Many "obvious" features are either missing or do not work as expected. For example: in many cases, once an internal user is added to an issue, they no longer receive notification about internal comments. This is completely unintuitive, unexpected, and has caused many people frustration: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDSERVER-3410 Another example: Email traffic about an issue is *always* public. Do not allow your staff to reply to JSD's emails as customers will also get emailed a copy! https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-3499 The worst part is, despite there being a few years' of discussion, and new comments added monthly by newly-affected JSD customers, Atlassian has no comments on the issues. In some cases a plugin (more $) can help, but in some cases even the plugin manufacturers can't help as JSD doesn't expose enough info in their plugin API.

Usuario verificado
Project Manager/Scrum Master en Bielorrusia
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Estudios de mercado, 51-200 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Unlike others, doesn't need complex configuration

5.0 hace 4 años

Comentarios: With the help of Service Desk we get feedback from users about the bugs they find in the product. As the result, we fix them really fast. By adding fields that users need to add while submitting bug, we decrease time that is needed to reproduce bug or clarify the issue. Also, we can communicate with user directly if needed.
At the same time user can always get back and see status of ticket they submitted.
Also, it says a lot when you see Atlassian using its own product and using it really well.

Puntos a favor:

When you use this application as an addition to JIRA, it is a great tandem. I adviced my company to use Service Desk when we were discussing how to receive bugs and ad-hoc requests. We are using this application fro several years and we do not think about changing it.

Contras:

The only bad point that I can mention about Service Desk is its price. A lot of clients I worked with complained about it. They manage really carefully the number of users that are Agents (users you actually pay for), and get really upset if they were not carefull enough and their bill was higher then they expected.

Mihai S.
Lead Atlassian Administrator en Rumanía
Tecnología y servicios de la información, 501-1,000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
Fuente de la reseña

Alternativas consideradas:

Jira Service Desk the best tool for support

4.0 hace 2 años

Comentarios: For me JSD was a challenge that thought me a lot. The product is awesome but there is still room for improvement.

Puntos a favor:

What I did like the most about JSD is the fact that you have a customer portal, a way to track and view your tickets at any time. You can customize the product to at very last detail without too much trouble.

Contras:

The stability of the software can be a sensitive balance after you reach 500.000 issues created on your instance.